Input hypothesis
The Input Hypothesis, proposed by linguist Stephen Krashen, suggests that we learn a language best when we are exposed to content slightly above our current understanding, termed "i+1." This means we should encounter new words and structures in context where we can comprehend most of the message but still face some new challenges. The idea is that by engaging with this slightly advanced language input, we naturally acquire language skills without explicit instruction or memorization, making the learning process more effective and enjoyable.
Additional Insights
-
The Input Hypothesis, proposed by linguist Stephen Krashen, suggests that language learners acquire new language skills best when they are exposed to language that is just slightly above their current proficiency level. This "i+1" concept means understanding most of what they hear or read but encountering some new vocabulary or structures. This exposure helps learners gradually improve their language ability in a natural way, much like how children learn their first language by interacting with others in their environment. Essentially, meaningful exposure to challenging yet comprehensible content fosters language acquisition.
-
The Input Hypothesis, proposed by linguist Stephen Krashen, suggests that people learn a language best when they are exposed to language input that is slightly more advanced than their current understanding. This means hearing or reading language that includes new words and structures, but is still understandable. By engaging with this "i+1" input, learners can gradually expand their knowledge and improve their language skills. Essentially, effective language learning occurs when learners receive comprehensive input that challenges them just enough to promote growth without overwhelming them.