Daubert Standard
The Daubert Standard is a legal rule used in U.S. courts to determine the admissibility of expert testimony. It requires that the evidence presented is based on valid scientific reasoning and methodology. Key factors include whether the theory can be tested, if it has been peer-reviewed, the error rates involved, and its general acceptance within the relevant scientific community. Essentially, it aims to ensure that expert opinions are grounded in reliable science, helping judges decide what evidence can be presented to juries in a way that informs rather than misleads.
Additional Insights
-
The Daubert standard is a legal guideline used in U.S. courts to determine if scientific evidence is admissible. Established by the Supreme Court in the Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals case, it requires judges to assess the relevance and reliability of expert testimony. Factors considered include whether the theory has been tested, peer-reviewed, and generally accepted in the scientific community. Essentially, it ensures that only credible, relevant scientific evidence is presented in court, helping to protect the integrity of the judicial process.