Critique of forensic methods

The critique of forensic methods highlights concerns about their reliability and accuracy in criminal investigations. Critics argue that some techniques, such as fingerprint analysis or bite mark comparison, lack scientific validation and can lead to wrongful convictions. There are also issues related to human error, bias, and the potential for subjective interpretations in evidence analysis. Additionally, the pressure for rapid results can compromise thoroughness. As a result, experts call for more rigorous scientific standards and better training to enhance the credibility of forensic evidence in the justice system.