Ramsden v Dyson

In Ramsden v Dyson (1855), the case established that for a contract to be valid, both parties must genuinely agree to all its terms, including repairs. Mr. Ramsden agreed to buy a house from Mr. Dyson, who promised to repair the roof before sale. When Dyson didn't fix it, Ramsden sued for breach of contract. The court held that Dyson's promise was part of the contract, and his failure to fulfill it meant the contract was broken. This case clarified that promises related to the main terms of a contract are legally binding, especially when they are essential to the agreement.