Karl Popper's Philosophy of Science

Karl Popper's philosophy of science emphasizes the importance of falsifiability over confirmation. Rather than trying to prove theories true, he argued that scientific theories should be testable and refutable. If a theory can survive rigorous testing without being disproven, it is considered scientific. This stands in contrast to confirmation theory, which focuses on accumulating positive evidence. Popper believed that science progresses through bold hypotheses that can be challenged, fostering a dynamic process wherein theories are improved or discarded based on evidence. Ultimately, his approach prioritizes critical scrutiny and the willingness to revise ideas in light of new findings.