United States v. Cummings

United States v. Cummings is a legal case that centered on the interpretation of federal law regarding the possession and distribution of marijuana. In this case, the defendant, Cummings, contended that his use of medical marijuana was lawful under state law, which conflicted with federal law prohibiting marijuana. The court ultimately ruled that federal law takes precedence, emphasizing that individuals cannot use state law to justify actions that violate federal prohibitions. This case highlights the ongoing tension between state-level legalization of marijuana and federal enforcement policies.