United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.

United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co. was a 1967 antitrust case where Schwinn Bicycle Company was accused of using illegal practices—like tying arrangements—to maintain a monopoly in the bicycle market. The government argued Schwinn limited competition by forcing independent bike shops to carry only Schwinn bicycles, restricting consumer choice. The court found that Schwinn’s actions violated antitrust laws, which aim to promote fair competition. This case clarified the importance of preventing practices that unfairly monopolize markets, ensuring consumers have access to diverse products and competition remains healthy in the industry.