Thomas v. Riddle

Thomas v. Riddle was a legal case where the court examined whether a person could be held responsible for providing information or a tool that indirectly led to a harmful act. In this case, the court emphasized that liability depends on whether the person intended the harm or knew it was likely to happen through their actions. Ultimately, the case highlighted the importance of assessing intent and foreseeability when determining responsibility for consequences resulting from one’s conduct.