"Rogers v. McGinnis"

"Rogers v. McGinnis" was a legal case addressing whether a defendant could be held liable for emotional distress caused to a plaintiff by subsequent harassment after an initial incident. The court examined if ongoing harassment, following an initial wrongful act, could be considered a continuing tort, making the defendant responsible for damages. Ultimately, the case clarified that liability depends on the nature and timing of the conduct, emphasizing that ongoing or repeated harmful behavior can extend the period of potential liability. This case helps define the boundaries of legal responsibility in cases involving persistent harassment or harm.