Robert Bork's Legal Philosophy

Robert Bork’s legal philosophy emphasized the importance of interpreting the Constitution based on its original meaning at the time it was written, rather than modern values or personal beliefs. He believed judges should act as interpreters, applying the law as intended, rather than making new laws through judicial activism. Bork supported a limited role for courts, advocating for clear laws that reflect societal consensus, and emphasized the importance of judicial restraint to preserve democratic decision-making. His approach aimed to maintain stability, predictability, and respect for the Constitution’s original principles.