R v. H (2004)

R v. H (2004) was a Canadian court case involving the defendant, H, who was charged with criminal offenses. The case focused on issues such as the mental state of the defendant and the proper application of criminal law principles. Ultimately, the court examined whether H had the necessary intent and understanding at the time of the alleged crime. The decision clarified legal standards around mental competence and responsibility, emphasizing the importance of properly evaluating evidence related to the defendant's mental condition when determining criminal liability.