Naylor v. Hargreaves

Naylor v. Hargreaves is a notable legal case concerning the enforcement of restrictive covenants in property law. In this case, a property owner, Naylor, sought to enforce a covenant that limited the use of adjacent land owned by Hargreaves, who wanted to use his property commercially. The court ruled in favor of Hargreaves, emphasizing that the covenant was too broad and restrictive. This case clarifies how courts interpret property agreements, balancing the interests of landowners while considering reasonable restrictions on property use. It highlights the importance of clear and enforceable terms in property transactions.