McDonald's coffee case

The McDonald’s coffee case involved a 1992 lawsuit where Stella Liebeck sued McDonald's after spilling hot coffee on herself, resulting in severe burns. The case highlighted concerns about product safety and corporate responsibility. McDonald's café coffee was found to be excessively hot—around 180-190°F—causing serious injuries. The jury awarded Liebeck damages, emphasizing that McDonald's was aware of the risks but did not adequately warn or modify the temperature. The case became a symbol in discussions about tort law, personal responsibility, and the perception of frivolous lawsuits, though many see it as a reminder of the importance of product safety standards.