Karl Popper's Critical Rationalism

Karl Popper's Critical Rationalism emphasizes that scientific knowledge is provisional and should be open to falsification. Instead of seeking definitive proofs, scientists should formulate hypotheses that can be tested and potentially disproven. In social epistemology, this approach suggests that knowledge evolves through critical discussion and debate, where ideas are rigorously challenged. This process helps eliminate errors and refine understanding, promoting a more dynamic and self-correcting view of knowledge in science and society. Ultimately, it embraces skepticism and the idea that uncertainty fuels progress in our pursuit of truth.