Is-Ought Problem

The Is-Ought Problem, identified by philosopher David Hume, highlights the logical gap between describing how things are (what *is*) and prescribing how they should be (what *ought* to be). Essentially, knowing the facts about the world doesn't automatically tell us what moral or ethical actions we should take. For example, just because something is a certain way doesn't mean it should be that way. This distinction urges careful reasoning when moving from observations to moral judgments, ensuring we don't assume moral rules can be directly derived from factual statements alone.