Gill v. Office of Personnel Management

Gill v. Office of Personnel Management was a legal case where the Supreme Court examined whether the Affordable Care Act's requirement for federal health insurance subsidies, which initially only applied to plans bought through state exchanges, was constitutional. The Court ruled that the law’s language was ambiguous, and because the government had historically enforced the law to include federal exchanges, the subsidies could be available on both state and federal exchanges. This decision preserved access to affordable health coverage for millions who relied on those subsidies, clarifying the law’s intent and application.