Critique of natural law

Critique of natural law questions whether it provides consistent or objective moral guidance, given its reliance on presumed universal human nature or reason. Critics argue that natural law can be ambiguous, culturally biased, or difficult to interpret, leading to varied and sometimes conflicting conclusions about what is "natural" or moral. Additionally, it may unjustly justify social hierarchies or oppressive practices by claiming they align with human nature. Overall, critics see natural law as problematic because it can be subjective and open to different interpretations, making it unreliable as a sole foundation for ethical decision-making.