Alexander v. Johnson

Alexander v. Johnson was a legal case where the court examined whether a defendant’s actions, which intentionally interfered with a contractual relationship, constituted wrongful conduct under the law. The plaintiff claimed that the defendant’s behavior caused economic harm and sought damages. The court focused on whether the defendant’s actions crossed legal boundaries of permissible conduct, balancing free negotiation against unlawful interference. Ultimately, the ruling clarified the standards for proving wrongful interference in contractual relationships, emphasizing that intentional and malicious acts aimed at disrupting established agreements can be legally actionable if they meet certain criteria.