"Against Elections"

"Against Elections" is a philosophical argument questioning whether holding regular elections truly leads to good governance. It suggests that elections can be influenced by popular opinions, money, and media, potentially resulting in leaders who prioritize popularity over competence or long-term benefit. Instead, proponents argue for alternative forms of governance, such as merit-based appointments or expert councils, which might promote better decision-making, stability, and effective policy. The idea isn't that elections are inherently bad, but that relying solely on them may not always produce the most capable or responsible leadership.